Skip to content
FinObservatory

Bank health / #35317

GLENMEDE TRUST CO NA

PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA · Noninsured non-deposit bank or trust company

$200.1M
Total assets
$0K
Total deposits
#35317
FDIC cert
Established
FinObservatory Composite
81.9/ 100
2026Q1, 0-100 where higher = financially stronger
Capital
weight 0.25
99.3
Asset quality
weight 0.25
94.0
Earnings
weight 0.20
38.4
Liquidity
weight 0.15
91.4
Sensitivity (proxy)
weight 0.15
81.3

Not a CAMELS rating. The FinObservatory Composite is a transparent proxy computed only from public FDIC call-report data. It is not the confidential examiner-assigned CAMELS rating, and it is not investment or deposit advice: a high score is not a solvency guarantee, a low score is not a failure prediction. In the 2023 failures, public ratios rated Silicon Valley Bank above average the quarter before it failed, because the cause (unrealized long-duration securities losses against a concentrated deposit base) is invisible in these fields. Full methodology and caveats.

Source: FDIC BankFind Suite (institutions, financials) Methodology

Composite and ratio trends

Quarterly, 1999Q22026Q1. The raw call-report ratios run back to 1992Q1 where FDIC reports them (the 1992–2014 history and the 2015–present panel join at a continuous, non-overlapping seam). The FinObservatory Composite begins 2015Q1 only: its peer-percentile scoring is built on the 2015+ panel, and pre-2015 quarters are shown as a gap rather than back-filled with an incomparable score. A field FDIC does not report for a given quarter is a gap, not a zero. Each panel has its own scale. Hover to read any quarter.

FinObservatory Composite (0-100)
0501002000200420082012201620202024
Tier-1 leverage ratio (%)
0501001502000200420082012201620202024
Total risk-based capital (%)
01002003002000200420082012201620202024
Noncurrent loans (% of loans)
-1012000200420082012201620202024
Return on assets (%)
-500501002000200420082012201620202024
Net interest margin (%)
05102000200420082012201620202024
Loans-to-deposits (%)
-1012000200420082012201620202024

Source: FDIC BankFind Suite (institutions, financials) Noncurrent loans = loans 90+ days past due or nonaccrual, as a share of gross loans; loans-to-deposits is net loans over deposits. Methodology

Peer context (UBPR-style)

2026Q1. Peers are the 2,696 banks reporting this quarter with $100M - $1B in total assets, the same asset tier the Composite ranks within (the five tiers: Under $100M, $100M - $1B, $1B - $10B, $10B - $250B, $250B and up). Percentile ranks the bank's raw ratio among the n peers reporting it, ascending, with average rank for ties (the Composite builder's tie convention), so a high noncurrent-loans percentile means more noncurrent loans than peers. Unlike the Composite, nothing is inverted here.

RatioBankPeer medianPercentilen
Tier-1 leverage ratio52.61%10.86%992,696
Noncurrent loans / gross loans0.00%0.40%62,696
Loan-loss reserve / gross loans0.00%1.20%02,696
Return on assets12.39%1.21%1002,696
Net interest margin2.79%3.86%72,696
Interest expense / earning assets0.00%1.69%02,696
Brokered deposits / total depositsn/a0.00%n/a2,682

Source: FDIC BankFind Suite (institutions, financials) | FFIEC UBPR User's Guide The bank / peer median / percentile grammar mirrors the FFIEC Uniform Bank Performance Report presentation, applied to public FDIC data; this is not the UBPR itself, and the asset tiers are FinObservatory peer groups, not FFIEC's. Methodology

This scorecard is a public-data proxy, not a CAMELS rating and not investment or deposit advice. See the methodology and caveats.