FinObservatory

Financial inclusion / BLR

Belarus

Belarus appears in 3 of the 5 Global Findex rounds in this file (2011, 2014, 2017). It has no account reading in 2021, 2024, so those columns are empty below rather than interpolated.

81.2%
Account, 2017
58.6%
Account, 2011
+22.6 pts
Change, 2011 to 2017
-0.4 pts
Gender gap, 2017
-
No reading in the 2024 round

Account ownership by group

Share of adults aged 15 and over with an account at a bank or with a mobile money provider. Each line is a separate survey estimate on a subsample, not a decomposition of the total.

% of adults age 15+506070809020112014201720212024All adults, 2011: 58.6All adults, 2014: 72.0All adults, 2017: 81.2All adults 81.2Women, 2011: 58.1Women, 2014: 72.0Women, 2017: 81.3Women 81.3Men, 2011: 59.2Men, 2014: 72.0Men, 2017: 80.9Men 80.9Poorest 40%, 2011: 50.4Poorest 40%, 2014: 66.6Poorest 40%, 2017: 74.4Poorest 40% 74.4

Source: World Bank Global Findex Database 2025 (CC BY-4.0) Indicators account.t.d, account.t.d.1, account.t.d.2, account.t.d.7. Methodology

Account ownership20112014201720212024
Women58.1%72.0%81.3%--
Men59.2%72.0%80.9%--
Poorest 40%50.4%66.6%74.4%--
Richest 60%64.0%75.6%85.6%--
Age 15-2441.7%48.2%55.2%--
Age 25+62.3%76.1%85.0%--
Primary education or less13.7%32.6%34.0%--
Secondary education or more67.4%78.9%89.4%--

Source: World Bank Global Findex Database 2025 (CC BY-4.0) A dash means the cut is not reported for Belarus in that round. The rural and urban cuts exist in one round only. Methodology

The gaps

Gender gap is the men’s account rate minus the women’s; income gap is the richest 60% minus the poorest 40%. Both are differences between two survey estimates and the file publishes no standard error for either, so a gap of a few points is not distinguishable from zero.

Percentage points-5.00.05.0101520112014201720212024Gender gap, 2011: 1.2Gender gap, 2014: 0.1Gender gap, 2017: -0.4Gender gap -0.4Income gap, 2011: 13.6Income gap, 2014: 9.0Income gap, 2017: 11.2Income gap 11.2

Source: World Bank Global Findex Database 2025 (CC BY-4.0) account.t.d.2 minus account.t.d.1; account.t.d.8 minus account.t.d.7. Methodology

Payments, saving and borrowing

The digital-payment, saved and borrowed indicators are not collected in every round or for every economy: in the 2024 round they are reported for a subset of the economies that report account ownership.

Share of adults age 15+20112014201720212024
Made or received a digital payment-66.4%78.7%--
Saved at a bank or using mobile money6.8%14.9%22.2%--
Borrowed from a bank or using mobile money-20.8%21.5%--

Source: World Bank Global Findex Database 2025 (CC BY-4.0) Indicators g20.any, mobileaccount.t.d, fin17a.17a1.d, fin22a.22a1.22g.d. A dash means no reading for Belarus in that round. Methodology

Physical access points

From the IMF Financial Access Survey by way of the GFDD, which stops in 2021. Each figure is Belarus’s latest reported year, which is shown beside it and is not necessarily the same year as another economy’s. These are the published values, reproduced without adjustment; for at least one economy the published branch and ATM counts are not physically possible, which the methodology page documents.

57.3
ATMs per 100,000 adults (2021)

Source: World Bank Global Financial Development Database | IMF Financial Access Survey GFDD.AI.02 and GFDD.AI.25, latest reported year for this economy. Methodology