FinObservatory

Sovereign haircuts / DOM

Dominican Republic

8 concluded restructurings, between 1872 and 2005. The earliest default they settle began in 1872. The worst cost creditors 100.0% of the present value of their claim, in 1872. The longest gap between a default and its settlement was 9 years.

8
Restructurings
42.2%
Median present-value haircut
100.0%
Worst present-value haircut
5 of 8
Cut face value by zero
$6.27B
Debt treated (2020 $)

Every restructuring

Two measures of the same deals, never combined. The present-value haircut discounts what creditors got against what they were owed; the face-value reduction counts only principal written off.

02040608010018721893189719081934198619942005Year the restructuring concluded
Present-value haircutFace-value reduction
DefaultSettledYears to settlePresent-value haircutFace-value reductionDebt treated (2020 $)Source
18721872repudiated0100.0%100.0%$163MMeyer, Reinhart and Trebesch (2022)
18921893154.0%0.0%$186MMeyer, Reinhart and Trebesch (2022)
18961897132.4%0.0%$367MMeyer, Reinhart and Trebesch (2022)
18991908932.4%50.0%$459MMeyer, Reinhart and Trebesch (2022)
19311934334.5%0.0%$250MMeyer, Reinhart and Trebesch (2022)
19821986449.9%0.0%$1.67BCruces and Trebesch (2013)
19871994750.5%39.7%$1.75BCruces and Trebesch (2013)
2004200514.7%0.0%$1.42BCruces and Trebesch (2013)

Source: Meyer, Reinhart & Trebesch (2022), Sovereign Bonds since Waterloo | Cruces & Trebesch (2013), Sovereign Defaults: The Price of Haircuts | Asonuma & Trebesch (2016) Debt treated is the amount restructured, deflated to constant 2020 US dollars in the source file. A negative haircut means the new instruments were worth more than the old claim. Methodology

Default spells

SpellFromToYearsRestructurings
DOM_1872-18721872187211
DOM_1892-18931892189321
DOM_1896-190818961908132
DOM_1931-19341931193441
DOM_1982-199419821994132
DOM_2004-20052004200521

Source: Meyer, Reinhart & Trebesch (2022), Sovereign Bonds since Waterloo | Cruces & Trebesch (2013), Sovereign Defaults: The Price of Haircuts | Asonuma & Trebesch (2016) Duration counts both endpoints. The spells table also carries a cumulative-haircut column; it is not published here because it does not reconcile with the per-episode haircuts, see the methodology. Methodology

The Cruces-Trebesch record: a third measure and the discount rate

The Cruces-Trebesch file carries 4 restructurings here, and adds the market haircut (the new instruments against the face value of the old claim, undiscounted) and the exit yield used to do the discounting. The deal label is the file’s own and is finer than the country: it names the instrument class the deal covered. The two files were assembled separately, so a deal here need not line up one-to-one with a row above.

DealDatePresent valueMarketFace valueExit yieldStructureData quality
Dom. Rep.1986-02-0149.9%49.9%0.0%24.8%-2 / 5
Dom. Rep.1994-08-0150.5%55.8%39.7%12.8%Brady deal3 / 5
Dom. Rep. (Bond debt)2005-05-014.7%4.1%0.0%9.5%bond exchange5 / 5
Dom. Rep (Bank debt)2005-10-0111.3%15.8%0.0%9.7%-2 / 5

Source: Cruces & Trebesch, haircut dataset (2014 update) Data quality is the file's own 1-to-5 index of how well the deal terms are documented. Methodology

Debt still in default

$33.0M across 1 creditor class in 2024. A haircut can only be measured once a restructuring concludes, so any of this that is still being negotiated is by construction absent from the tables above.

Creditor classIn default, 2024
Other official creditors$33.0M

Source: Bank of Canada-Bank of England Sovereign Default Database (CRAG) Bank of Canada terms (attribution). Includes domestic arrears, so it is not comparable with the debt-treated column above. Methodology

Methodology, the measures, and what this data cannot tell you