US bank holding companies
Until Q1 2006, this panel counts the same assets twice
The FR Y-9C is the Federal Reserve’s consolidated financial statement for holding companies: the parent and every subsidiary it consolidates, on one balance sheet, rather than the insured bank alone. FinObservatory holds 181,114 of these filings from 4,842 holding companies over 139 quarters, Q3 1986 through Q1 2021. The first thing the panel does is break. Sum the assets of the 2,310 filers reporting at Q4 2005 and the total is $16.18T. Sum the 1,009 filers reporting one quarter later and it is $11.53T, a 28.7% fall in a single quarter. 1,303 entities holding $5.18T, 32.0% of the earlier total, report at Q4 2005 and not at Q1 2006. The reporting threshold rose at that boundary too, and it explains the small filers. It cannot explain the largest one to leave, which reported $1.28T.
The discontinuity
The filer count for every quarter of the panel, and what you get if you sum TOTAL_ASSETS over those filers. The dashed red series is drawn to be discarded: it is not a measure of the holding-company system, it is the same assets added up more than once. The vertical rule marks the break quarter.
Filers reporting each quarter
Sum of reported consolidated assets
Source: Federal Reserve, FR Y-9C Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies 181,114 filings, 139 quarters. The break quarter is derived, not assumed: it is the largest quarter-on-quarter fall in the filer count anywhere in the panel (2,310 to 1,009). Dollar fields are thousands of USD. Methodology
The ten largest filers that vanished at Q1 2006
Consolidated assets as reported at Q4 2005, the last quarter each of these entities filed. A raised reporting threshold removes small filers. It does not remove these: the largest entity to stop filing reported $1.28T.
Source: Federal Reserve, FR Y-9C Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies Filers present at Q4 2005 and absent at Q1 2006, ranked by reported consolidated assets. Methodology
Why this is a filing change and not deleveraging
The largest exit, N B HOLDINGS CORP (RSSD 2173092), reported $1.28T at Q4 2005 and never filed again. BANK OF AMER CORP (RSSD 1073757) reported $1.29T in the same quarter, kept filing, and reported $1.38T in the quarter N B HOLDINGS CORP disappeared, 6.3% more than the quarter before. The Federal Reserve’s National Information Center records N B HOLDINGS CORP as a subsidiary holding company of BANK OF AMER CORP. N B HOLDINGS CORP consolidates a total equal to 98.8% of BANK OF AMER CORP’s in that quarter, and the raw panel total adds both.
Source: Federal Reserve, FR Y-9C Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies | Federal Reserve, National Information Center Both figures are reported TOTAL_ASSETS_THOUSANDS_USD for the RSSD and quarter shown. Methodology
The clean panel, Q1 2006 to Q1 2021
61 quarters that can be summed. Consolidated assets rise from $11.53T to $25.07T, while the filer count goes from 1,009 to 349, a 65.4% fall between the endpoints. The path is not monotone: the count reaches 1,178 at Q1 2013 before it drops. Two of the three largest single-quarter falls anywhere in the panel happen inside this window, so part of the decline is a change in who has to file rather than in who exists.
Consolidated assets
Filers
Source: Federal Reserve, FR Y-9C Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies Sums of TOTAL_ASSETS_THOUSANDS_USD over every filer in each quarter from Q1 2006. Nominal dollars, as filed. Methodology
Concentration: the finding is that there is no finding
Read naively, the top-5 share of consolidated assets goes from 45.8% at Q1 2006 to 48.8% at Q1 2021, peaking at 55.6% at Q4 2008. That series is not comparable across quarters: the denominator lost 660 filers over the same span, and dropping small filers raises a top-5 share by construction. Recompute it on a fixed population, the largest 349 filers, and the share is 47.5% at Q1 2006 against 48.8% at Q1 2021: up 1.3 points in 15 years, and 8.8 points below its Q4 2008 peak of 57.6%. The consolidation this layer is supposed to show is 1.3 points of top-5 share. That is the result, and it is a null one.
Source: Federal Reserve, FR Y-9C Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies Shares of summed TOTAL_ASSETS_THOUSANDS_USD in each quarter. The fixed-population series is computable in 59 of the 61 clean-panel quarters; the other 2 have fewer than 349 filers, so the line breaks rather than being extrapolated. Methodology
Capital, in aggregate
Equity capital over assets rises from 8.20% at Q1 2006 to 9.75% at Q1 2021; Tier 1 over assets, from 6.14% to 7.90%. Both are aggregate ratios, sum of the numerator over sum of the denominator, not the average of filer-level ratios. The equity line is common and preferred equity capital, which on this form excludes noncontrolling interests, so it is not the residual of assets minus liabilities. The Tier 1 line is drawn only over filers that report Tier 1: 344 of 349 at Q1 2021. A filer that does not report it is rendered n/a, never zero.
Source: Federal Reserve, FR Y-9C Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies Tier 1 is null in every one of the 56,150 filings dated before Q1 1996, the first quarter any filer reports it, and in 4,124 filings from that quarter onward; a separate 329 filings report a genuine zero. Both numerator and denominator of this ratio are summed over reporting filers only: nulls are excluded, not zero-filled. Methodology
The layer above the insured bank, at Q1 2021
At the panel’s last quarter, 349 holding companies consolidate $25.07T, while the 5,044 FDIC-insured institutions that /banks scores hold $22.73T. The ratio is 1.103. These are two reporting perimeters, not two tiers of a stack: a holding company’s consolidated total already contains its insured bank, so the two levels overlap and must never be added. The $2.34T difference is a residual between two different populations, and it cannot be read as the size of the nonbank system: the FDIC universe also contains insured banks owned by no FR Y-9C filer.
Source: Federal Reserve, FR Y-9C Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies | FDIC, quarterly financial data on insured institutions bhc_financials and fdic_financials at Q1 2021, both in thousands of USD. Methodology
These filers are not all banks
Calling this panel “the US banking system” would be wrong. It is the set of FR Y-9C filers, and that set has included an insurer, a reciprocal inter-insurance exchange, two former investment banks and a card company. Their first and last filing quarters are below. When one of them joins or leaves the panel, the consolidated total moves even though no bank’s balance sheet changed.
| Filer | First filing | Last filing | Quarters | Peak consolidated assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP THE 2380443 | Q1 2009 | Q1 2021 | 49 | $1.30T |
| MORGAN STANLEY 2162966 | Q1 2009 | Q1 2021 | 49 | $1.16T |
| METLIFE 2945824 | Q1 2001 | Q3 2012 | 47 | $846.29B |
| UNITED SVC AUTO ASSN 1447376 | Q1 2012 | Q1 2021 | 37 | $211.59B |
| AMERICAN EXPRESS CO 1275216 | Q1 2009 | Q1 2021 | 49 | $198.31B |
Source: Federal Reserve, FR Y-9C Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies Five filers selected by RSSD to show the panel's composition; the peak is the largest consolidated total each ever reported. Methodology
The panel is a moving regulatory window
The three largest quarter-on-quarter falls in the filer count. At each one the median filer jumps in size by the multiple in the last column, which is the signature of a raised reporting threshold rather than of exits. Any mean, share or ratio computed across one of these boundaries compares two different populations.
| Boundary | Filers before | Filers after | Median filer before | Median filer after | Multiple |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 2005 to Q1 2006 | 2,310 | 1,009 | $372.2M | $827.3M | 2.22x |
| Q4 2014 to Q1 2015 | 1,129 | 677 | $1.07B | $1.89B | 1.77x |
| Q2 2018 to Q3 2018 | 650 | 372 | $2.30B | $5.53B | 2.40x |
Source: Federal Reserve, FR Y-9C Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies Median of TOTAL_ASSETS_THOUSANDS_USD across the filers in each quarter. The first row is also the double-count break. Methodology
The 25 largest holding companies at Q1 2021
Ranked by consolidated assets at the last quarter in the panel, with each one’s share of the $25.07T consolidated by all 349 filers. Tier 1 is shown as filed; where a filer did not report it the cell reads n/a.
| # | Holding company | Consolidated assets | Equity capital | Tier 1 | Share of panel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1039502 | $3.69T | $280.71B | $237.33B | 14.71% |
| 2 | BANK OF AMER CORP 1073757 | $2.97T | $274.00B | $201.22B | 11.85% |
| 3 | CITIGROUP 1951350 | $2.31T | $202.55B | $170.48B | 9.23% |
| 4 | WELLS FARGO & CO 1120754 | $1.96T | $187.22B | $159.68B | 7.82% |
| 5 | GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP THE 2380443 | $1.30T | $97.66B | $94.31B | 5.19% |
| 6 | MORGAN STANLEY 2162966 | $1.16T | $106.26B | $84.06B | 4.62% |
| 7 | CHARLES SCHWAB CORP 1026632 | $563.46B | $55.59B | $34.84B | 2.25% |
| 8 | U S BC 1119794 | $553.38B | $51.68B | $45.52B | 2.21% |
| 9 | TD GRP US HOLDS LLC 3606542 | $517.84B | $56.50B | $38.97B | 2.07% |
| 10 | TRUIST FC 1074156 | $517.54B | $67.88B | $45.39B | 2.06% |
| 11 | PNC FNCL SVC GROUP 1069778 | $474.51B | $53.85B | $44.28B | 1.89% |
| 12 | BANK OF NY MELLON CORP 3587146 | $464.98B | $44.95B | $25.53B | 1.85% |
| 13 | CAPITAL ONE FC 2277860 | $425.18B | $61.19B | $47.90B | 1.70% |
| 14 | STATE STREET CORP 1111435 | $316.88B | $25.00B | $15.42B | 1.26% |
| 15 | HSBC N AMER HOLDS 3232316 | $248.21B | $20.96B | $19.49B | 0.99% |
| 16 | UNITED SVC AUTO ASSN 1447376 | $211.59B | $39.28B | n/a | 0.84% |
| 17 | FIFTH THIRD BC 1070345 | $206.90B | $22.60B | $17.05B | 0.83% |
| 18 | BMO FNCL CORP 1245415 | $194.19B | $21.50B | $17.81B | 0.77% |
| 19 | AMERICAN EXPRESS CO 1275216 | $193.07B | $24.45B | $21.58B | 0.77% |
| 20 | CITIZENS FNCL GRP 1132449 | $187.60B | $22.65B | $16.83B | 0.75% |
| 21 | UBS AMERS HOLD LLC 4846998 | $182.78B | $28.37B | $17.76B | 0.73% |
| 22 | ALLY FNCL 1562859 | $181.88B | $14.63B | $17.80B | 0.73% |
| 23 | KEYCORP 1068025 | $176.34B | $17.63B | $15.14B | 0.70% |
| 24 | MUFG AMERS HOLDS CORP 1378434 | $169.97B | $17.07B | $16.14B | 0.68% |
| 25 | BARCLAYS US LLC 5006575 | $169.32B | $17.62B | $17.12B | 0.68% |
Source: Federal Reserve, FR Y-9C Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies As filed for Q1 2021. Equity capital excludes noncontrolling interests. Entity pages exist for every filer in this quarter and for every filer that ever peaked at or above $10.00B: 570 in total. Methodology
The clean panel, quarter by quarter
The filer count sits beside each share, so no share can be read without its denominator.
| Quarter | Filers | Consolidated assets | Equity / assets | Tier 1 / assets | Tier 1 filers | Top 5 | Top 25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2006 | 1,009 | $11.53T | 8.20% | 6.14% | 1,007 | 45.8% | 77.0% |
| Q2 2006 | 998 | $11.81T | 8.07% | 6.13% | 997 | 46.2% | 77.2% |
| Q3 2006 | 995 | $12.10T | 8.21% | 6.22% | 994 | 46.4% | 77.5% |
| Q4 2006 | 986 | $12.43T | 8.33% | 6.20% | 986 | 47.7% | 78.5% |
| Q1 2007 | 988 | $12.75T | 8.11% | 5.95% | 988 | 48.6% | 79.5% |
| Q2 2007 | 980 | $13.20T | 7.88% | 5.84% | 980 | 49.3% | 79.8% |
| Q3 2007 | 975 | $13.65T | 7.90% | 5.71% | 975 | 49.6% | 80.5% |
| Q4 2007 | 966 | $13.58T | 7.80% | 5.43% | 966 | 51.0% | 81.0% |
| Q1 2008 | 979 | $14.08T | 7.76% | 5.43% | 979 | 50.8% | 81.7% |
| Q2 2008 | 975 | $13.83T | 8.09% | 5.84% | 975 | 51.2% | 81.3% |
| Q3 2008 | 976 | $14.83T | 7.31% | 5.44% | 976 | 51.1% | 82.5% |
| Q4 2008 | 973 | $13.93T | 8.24% | 6.52% | 973 | 55.6% | 81.9% |
| Q1 2009 | 1,033 | $15.85T | 8.61% | 6.99% | 1,033 | 53.2% | 82.1% |
| Q2 2009 | 1,027 | $15.89T | 8.89% | 7.22% | 1,027 | 52.3% | 81.8% |
| Q3 2009 | 1,020 | $16.09T | 8.97% | 7.27% | 1,020 | 51.6% | 82.0% |
| Q4 2009 | 1,015 | $15.99T | 8.90% | 7.11% | 1,015 | 51.4% | 81.9% |
| Q1 2010 | 1,049 | $16.51T | 8.69% | 6.89% | 1,049 | 52.0% | 82.5% |
| Q2 2010 | 1,035 | $16.28T | 9.10% | 7.18% | 1,035 | 51.8% | 82.3% |
| Q3 2010 | 1,024 | $16.64T | 9.16% | 7.20% | 1,024 | 51.7% | 82.7% |
| Q4 2010 | 1,010 | $16.22T | 9.40% | 7.45% | 1,010 | 52.2% | 82.5% |
| Q1 2011 | 1,030 | $16.50T | 9.44% | 7.39% | 1,030 | 52.1% | 82.6% |
| Q2 2011 | 1,021 | $16.69T | 9.48% | 7.37% | 1,021 | 51.9% | 82.8% |
| Q3 2011 | 1,015 | $16.81T | 9.63% | 7.34% | 1,015 | 51.8% | 82.6% |
| Q4 2011 | 1,018 | $16.54T | 9.74% | 7.52% | 1,018 | 51.5% | 82.7% |
| Q1 2012 | 1,161 | $17.61T | 10.01% | 7.81% | 1,034 | 49.6% | 78.8% |
| Q2 2012 | 1,157 | $17.54T | 10.21% | 7.81% | 1,032 | 49.3% | 78.6% |
| Q3 2012 | 1,155 | $17.77T | 10.32% | 7.80% | 1,029 | 49.2% | 78.6% |
| Q4 2012 | 1,140 | $17.59T | 10.59% | 7.89% | 1,015 | 50.0% | 78.5% |
| Q1 2013 | 1,178 | $17.66T | 10.73% | 8.07% | 1,050 | 50.1% | 78.5% |
| Q2 2013 | 1,166 | $18.11T | 10.91% | 8.17% | 1,038 | 48.7% | 78.7% |
| Q3 2013 | 1,159 | $18.26T | 10.94% | 8.21% | 1,032 | 48.8% | 78.7% |
| Q4 2013 | 1,143 | $18.09T | 11.08% | 8.32% | 1,025 | 48.9% | 78.9% |
| Q1 2014 | 1,162 | $18.39T | 11.16% | 8.47% | 1,043 | 48.9% | 78.7% |
| Q2 2014 | 1,143 | $18.04T | 11.09% | 8.60% | 1,028 | 50.2% | 78.6% |
| Q3 2014 | 1,138 | $18.05T | 11.14% | 8.68% | 1,026 | 50.1% | 78.4% |
| Q4 2014 | 1,129 | $18.20T | 11.12% | 8.74% | 1,026 | 49.8% | 78.2% |
| Q1 2015 | 677 | $18.12T | 11.14% | 8.74% | 665 | 50.5% | 79.4% |
| Q2 2015 | 666 | $18.03T | 11.31% | 8.95% | 654 | 50.0% | 79.0% |
| Q3 2015 | 660 | $18.03T | 11.48% | 9.06% | 648 | 50.0% | 78.9% |
| Q4 2015 | 653 | $18.04T | 11.49% | 9.17% | 647 | 49.2% | 77.5% |
| Q1 2016 | 660 | $18.39T | 11.44% | 9.06% | 655 | 49.7% | 77.6% |
| Q2 2016 | 655 | $18.39T | 11.42% | 9.03% | 650 | 50.3% | 77.9% |
| Q3 2016 | 649 | $19.68T | 11.27% | 8.88% | 644 | 47.6% | 75.3% |
| Q4 2016 | 646 | $19.47T | 11.27% | 9.02% | 641 | 47.6% | 75.0% |
| Q1 2017 | 668 | $19.67T | 11.20% | 8.91% | 663 | 48.1% | 75.6% |
| Q2 2017 | 654 | $19.77T | 11.28% | 8.97% | 649 | 48.2% | 75.7% |
| Q3 2017 | 650 | $19.91T | 11.27% | 8.96% | 645 | 48.2% | 75.7% |
| Q4 2017 | 641 | $19.83T | 11.13% | 8.88% | 636 | 48.0% | 75.3% |
| Q1 2018 | 656 | $20.14T | 10.99% | 8.75% | 651 | 48.4% | 75.4% |
| Q2 2018 | 650 | $20.10T | 11.11% | 8.87% | 646 | 48.0% | 75.1% |
| Q3 2018 | 372 | $19.74T | 11.07% | 8.79% | 368 | 49.2% | 76.8% |
| Q4 2018 | 373 | $19.93T | 11.07% | 8.72% | 368 | 48.8% | 76.6% |
| Q1 2019 | 364 | $20.19T | 11.11% | 8.76% | 359 | 49.0% | 76.6% |
| Q2 2019 | 363 | $20.62T | 11.11% | 8.79% | 357 | 48.4% | 76.1% |
| Q3 2019 | 358 | $20.90T | 10.97% | 8.65% | 352 | 48.6% | 76.1% |
| Q4 2019 | 353 | $20.82T | 10.98% | 8.64% | 348 | 48.0% | 76.5% |
| Q1 2020 | 353 | $22.76T | 10.01% | 7.88% | 348 | 48.5% | 77.4% |
| Q2 2020 | 350 | $23.30T | 9.91% | 7.89% | 345 | 48.5% | 76.7% |
| Q3 2020 | 348 | $23.30T | 10.08% | 8.09% | 343 | 48.4% | 76.4% |
| Q4 2020 | 348 | $24.08T | 10.08% | 8.07% | 343 | 48.1% | 77.1% |
| Q1 2021 | 349 | $25.07T | 9.75% | 7.90% | 344 | 48.8% | 77.2% |
Source: Federal Reserve, FR Y-9C Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies Tier 1 / assets is summed over reporting filers only; the Tier 1 filers column is that count. Methodology
What this module cannot tell you
It cannot net a holding company against its own bank, but not for the reason you would expect. bhc_financials keys on the holding company’s RSSD and call_reports keys on the bank’s, and the two identifier sets barely touch: 1 of the 4,842 holding-company RSSDs here appears in call_reports.idrssd. A parent-child key nevertheless exists, in a table this module went looking for: the FDIC Summary of Deposits (sod_branches) carries both rssdhcr, a bank’s high-holder holding company, and rssdid, the bank itself. It matches 310 of the 349 filers in the panel’s last quarter, 89.1% of the consolidated assets. So the map is real. What it does not deliver is a clean comparison, and the data says so out loud: for 32 of those 310 holding companies, the subsidiary banks’ call reports sum to more than the parent consolidates, which no true subset of a balance sheet can do. FinObservatory therefore publishes no holdco-versus-bank ratio.
It cannot compute double leverage.The ratio needs the parent’s equity investment in its subsidiaries (BHCK2130 on the form). This table carries four measures: total assets, total liabilities, total equity capital and Tier 1 capital. The numerator does not exist in the data, so the number is not estimated, proxied or approximated. It is absent.
It cannot produce a dollar SRISK, and here is exactly what is missing. Consolidated book debt is here: TOTAL_LIABILITIES_THOUSANDS_USD is a reported field, present in all 181,114 filings with 0 nulls and 4 zeros. Long-run marginal expected shortfall is also in the estate. What is missing is the market value of equity: no table in FinObservatory carries a holding company’s market capitalisation, and there is no ticker-to-RSSD crosswalk to build one. SRISK stays unbuilt rather than being filled in with a book-value stand-in.
It cannot say anything about the system after Q1 2021. The source stops there. For the current picture of the insured banks inside these holding companies, use /banks; for market-based systemic risk on listed banks, use /systemic.
The methodology sets out the form, the double count, the noncontrolling-interest identity break (22,182 of 181,114 filings), the reporting-threshold steps and the Q1 2021 cutoff.