FinObservatory

Sovereign haircuts / MAR

Morocco

3 concluded restructurings, between 1986 and 1990. The earliest default they settle began in 1983. The worst cost creditors 40.3% of the present value of their claim, in 1990. The longest gap between a default and its settlement was 3 years.

3
Restructurings
23.5%
Median present-value haircut
40.3%
Worst present-value haircut
3 of 3
Cut face value by zero
$11.63B
Debt treated (2020 $)

Every restructuring

Two measures of the same deals, never combined. The present-value haircut discounts what creditors got against what they were owed; the face-value reduction counts only principal written off.

020406080100198619871990Year the restructuring concluded
Present-value haircutFace-value reduction
DefaultSettledYears to settlePresent-value haircutFace-value reductionDebt treated (2020 $)Source
19831986323.5%0.0%$1.09BCruces and Trebesch (2013)
19851987221.3%0.0%$4.85BCruces and Trebesch (2013)
19891990140.3%0.0%$5.69BCruces and Trebesch (2013)

Source: Meyer, Reinhart & Trebesch (2022), Sovereign Bonds since Waterloo | Cruces & Trebesch (2013), Sovereign Defaults: The Price of Haircuts | Asonuma & Trebesch (2016) Debt treated is the amount restructured, deflated to constant 2020 US dollars in the source file. A negative haircut means the new instruments were worth more than the old claim. Methodology

Default spells

SpellFromToYearsRestructurings
MAR_1983-19901983199083

Source: Meyer, Reinhart & Trebesch (2022), Sovereign Bonds since Waterloo | Cruces & Trebesch (2013), Sovereign Defaults: The Price of Haircuts | Asonuma & Trebesch (2016) Duration counts both endpoints. The spells table also carries a cumulative-haircut column; it is not published here because it does not reconcile with the per-episode haircuts, see the methodology. Methodology

The Cruces-Trebesch record: a third measure and the discount rate

The Cruces-Trebesch file carries 3 restructurings here, and adds the market haircut (the new instruments against the face value of the old claim, undiscounted) and the exit yield used to do the discounting. The deal label is the file’s own and is finer than the country: it names the instrument class the deal covered. The two files were assembled separately, so a deal here need not line up one-to-one with a row above.

DealDatePresent valueMarketFace valueExit yieldStructureData quality
Morocco1986-02-0123.5%23.5%0.0%17.0%-3 / 5
Morocco1987-09-0121.3%21.3%0.0%16.3%-2 / 5
Morocco1990-09-0140.3%40.3%0.0%18.0%-2 / 5

Source: Cruces & Trebesch, haircut dataset (2014 update) Data quality is the file's own 1-to-5 index of how well the deal terms are documented. Methodology

Debt still in default

$520.0M across 2 creditor classes in 2024. A haircut can only be measured once a restructuring concludes, so any of this that is still being negotiated is by construction absent from the tables above.

Creditor classIn default, 2024
Domestic (fiscal) arrears$520.0M
Other official creditors$50K

Source: Bank of Canada-Bank of England Sovereign Default Database (CRAG) Bank of Canada terms (attribution). Includes domestic arrears, so it is not comparable with the debt-treated column above. Methodology

Methodology, the measures, and what this data cannot tell you