FinObservatory

Sovereign haircuts / NIC

Nicaragua

11 concluded restructurings, between 1874 and 2007. The earliest default they settle began in 1828. The worst cost creditors 95.5% of the present value of their claim, in 2007. The longest gap between a default and its settlement was 46 years.

11
Restructurings
41.7%
Median present-value haircut
95.5%
Worst present-value haircut
7 of 11
Cut face value by zero
$6.18B
Debt treated (2020 $)

Every restructuring

Two measures of the same deals, never combined. The present-value haircut discounts what creditors got against what they were owed; the face-value reduction counts only principal written off.

02040608010018741895191219171937198019811982198419952007Year the restructuring concluded
Present-value haircutFace-value reduction
DefaultSettledYears to settlePresent-value haircutFace-value reductionDebt treated (2020 $)Source
182818744685.7%96.3%$2MMeyer, Reinhart and Trebesch (2022)
1894189515.4%5.4%$40MMeyer, Reinhart and Trebesch (2022)
19111912115.5%0.0%$24MMeyer, Reinhart and Trebesch (2022)
1914191736.3%0.0%$71MMeyer, Reinhart and Trebesch (2022)
19321937539.3%0.0%$30MMeyer, Reinhart and Trebesch (2022)
19781980226.1%0.0%$1.56BCruces and Trebesch (2013)
19811981048.5%0.0%$470MCruces and Trebesch (2013)
19821982056.3%0.0%$230MCruces and Trebesch (2013)
19831984141.7%0.0%$310MCruces and Trebesch (2013)
198519951092.0%92.0%$1.73BCruces and Trebesch (2013)
197920072895.5%95.5%$1.71BCruces and Trebesch (2013)

Source: Meyer, Reinhart & Trebesch (2022), Sovereign Bonds since Waterloo | Cruces & Trebesch (2013), Sovereign Defaults: The Price of Haircuts | Asonuma & Trebesch (2016) Debt treated is the amount restructured, deflated to constant 2020 US dollars in the source file. A negative haircut means the new instruments were worth more than the old claim. Methodology

Default spells

SpellFromToYearsRestructurings
NIC_1828-187418281874471
NIC_1894-18951894189521
NIC_1911-19171911191772
NIC_1932-19371932193761
NIC_1978-200719782007306

Source: Meyer, Reinhart & Trebesch (2022), Sovereign Bonds since Waterloo | Cruces & Trebesch (2013), Sovereign Defaults: The Price of Haircuts | Asonuma & Trebesch (2016) Duration counts both endpoints. The spells table also carries a cumulative-haircut column; it is not published here because it does not reconcile with the per-episode haircuts, see the methodology. Methodology

The Cruces-Trebesch record: a third measure and the discount rate

The Cruces-Trebesch file carries 6 restructurings here, and adds the market haircut (the new instruments against the face value of the old claim, undiscounted) and the exit yield used to do the discounting. The deal label is the file’s own and is finer than the country: it names the instrument class the deal covered. The two files were assembled separately, so a deal here need not line up one-to-one with a row above.

DealDatePresent valueMarketFace valueExit yieldStructureData quality
Nicaragua1980-12-0126.1%26.1%0.0%25.7%-2 / 5
Nicaragua1981-12-0148.5%48.5%0.0%33.6%-2 / 5
Nicaragua1982-03-0156.3%56.3%0.0%41.2%-2 / 5
Nicaragua1984-02-0141.7%41.7%0.0%34.3%-2 / 5
Nicaragua1995-11-0192.0%92.0%92.0%none (buy back)buyback3 / 5
Nicaragua2007-12-0195.5%95.5%95.5%none (buy back)buyback3 / 5

Source: Cruces & Trebesch, haircut dataset (2014 update) Data quality is the file's own 1-to-5 index of how well the deal terms are documented. Methodology

Debt still in default

$1.23B across 2 creditor classes in 2024. A haircut can only be measured once a restructuring concludes, so any of this that is still being negotiated is by construction absent from the tables above.

Creditor classIn default, 2024
Other official creditors$1.21B
China (official)$18.0M

Source: Bank of Canada-Bank of England Sovereign Default Database (CRAG) Bank of Canada terms (attribution). Includes domestic arrears, so it is not comparable with the debt-treated column above. Methodology

Methodology, the measures, and what this data cannot tell you