Skip to content
FinObservatory

Wealth & distribution

Compare who captures income and wealth across countries

How concentrated income and wealth are, and how that has moved over a century, from the maintained public series rather than any single headline. Income and wealth concentration come from WID.world (the Piketty-Saez-Zucman distributional accounts, measured on equal-split adults); Gini coefficients from World Bank PIP surveys and the OECD, cross-checked against the UNU-WIDER WIID; and global poverty from PIP at the poverty lines the World Bank rebased to 2021 purchasing power parities in June 2025. Fiscal-data top shares and survey Ginis measure different things and are never mixed in one ranking, and where the field's headline number is genuinely contested, as the US top-1% income share is, both estimates are shown.

10.4%
Live below $3.00 a day
847 million, 2024 (PIP, 2021 PPP)
20.7%
US top 1% pre-tax income
WID / PSZ, 2024; contested, see below
70.9%
Highest income top-10% share
Iraq, 2024 (WID)
216
Economies, WID top shares
1800-2024; PIP 172, WIID 200

Data as of WID.world (income/wealth shares to 2024), Auten-Splinter (US inequality series to 2022), World Bank PIP (release 20260324, 2021 PPP), OECD IDD, UNU-WIDER WIID (29 April 2025)

Inequality

Iraq has the highest top 10% income share

The share of pre-tax national income going to the top 10%, measured on equal-split adults (each adult in a couple assigned half the couple's income). At 2024 the range runs from Iraq at 70.9% to Slovakia at 26.8%. WID extends every country's series to the most recent years by extrapolation, so the newest cross-section values are estimates; the long-run lines below carry more information than any single recent year. Bangladesh and the major economies are highlighted.

Source: WID.world, pre-tax national income (sptinc), equal-split adults, 2024. Share of the top 10%. Recent years are extrapolated by WID; ranking is a position in a distribution, not a score.

Inequality

US income concentration exceeds France and Bangladesh

The same measure since 1900 for eight economies. In 2024, the top 10% took 46.8% of pre-tax income in the United States against 34.0% in France and 42.4% in Bangladesh.
United StatesFranceGermanyUnited KingdomJapanChinaIndiaBangladesh

Source: WID.world, pre-tax national income, equal-split adults. Share of the top 10%.

Inequality

The US top-1% income share is contested by construction

This is one of the most-cited inequality statistics, and one of the least settled. This WID series maintains the Piketty-Saez-Zucman estimate: the top 1% took 20.7% of US pre-tax national income in 2024. The Auten-Splinter figures that follow report alternative estimates under distinct national-income definitions. Differences in income definition and allocation are part of the disagreement.
United States

Source: Piketty, Saez and Zucman (Quarterly Journal of Economics 133(2), 2018), maintained in the World Inequality Database. Methodology

Inequality

Auten-Splinter estimates depend on the income definition

These are separate definitions, not variants of one number. In 2022, the top 1% share is 15.5% for Pre-tax national income, 13.4% for Pre-tax income plus transfers, and 10.3% for Post-tax national income. The post-tax value is 5.2 percentage points below the pre-tax value. Every published observation from 1960 through 2022 is shown; absent years are not interpolated.
Pre-tax national incomePre-tax income plus transfersPost-tax national income
These national-income series are not a continuation of the 2014 fiscal-income comparison discussed in the methodology; the concepts and vintages differ.

Source: Auten and Splinter, Journal of Political Economy (2024) | Extensions and Updates (May 2025) Top-income companion series through 2022; cite-and-display-only. Methodology

Inequality

The income definition also changes the measured Gini

Gini coefficient, 0-1. The series use the same three distinct definitions as the top-share figure. Every published observation from 1960 through 2022 is shown; absent years are not interpolated.
Pre-tax national incomePre-tax income plus transfersPost-tax national income
These national-income Gini series use the same concepts and vintage as the Auten-Splinter top-share figure.

Source: Auten and Splinter, Journal of Political Economy (2024) | Extensions and Updates (May 2025) Gini companion series through 2022; cite-and-display-only. Methodology

Inequality

Sweden combines low income concentration with high wealth concentration

Wealth is a stock and income is a flow; a country can pair low income inequality with high wealth concentration, so the two are never combined into one ranking. Sweden is the standard illustration: its top 10% take 29.0% of income (2024), among the lowest anywhere, while its top 1% hold 27.5% of net personal wealth (2024), well above the low end. The chart ranks the top 1% share of net personal wealth, equal-split adults, at 2024.

Source: WID.world, net personal wealth (shweal), equal-split adults, 2024. Wealth series carry wider extrapolation than income; treat the newest years as estimates.

Inequality

Wealth concentration collapsed in Britain and France; the US ended near its starting level

Annual share of net personal wealth held by the top 1% in the United States, France, United Kingdom and China, from the turn of the twentieth century through the latest observation.
United StatesFranceUnited KingdomChina

Source: WID.world, net personal wealth, equal-split adults. Share of the top 1%.

Gini coefficients: three survey measures side by side

Survey-based Gini coefficients from three sources, each on its own basis and shown with its year rather than blended. The OECD figure is disposable (post-tax, post-transfer) income, current definition; PIP is the World Bank survey Gini with its welfare concept (income or consumption); WIID is UNU-WIDER's latest High-quality observation, drawn from a compilation that spans welfare concepts, so each WIID figure carries the concept of the row it comes from. Bangladesh reads 0.309 on PIP consumption (2022) and 0.499 on its latest High-quality WIID row (2022), whose welfare concept is income (net/gross). Bangladesh is absent from the OECD, which covers members and a few key partners only; that gap is shown, not hidden.

EconomyOECD disposablePIP surveyWIID (High)
United States0.394 (2023)0.418 (2024, inc.)0.478 (2023, income (gross))
United Kingdom0.367 (2023)0.324 (2021, inc.)0.350 (2023, income (net))
France0.299 (2023)0.318 (2023, inc.)0.296 (2023, income (net))
Germany0.307 (2023)0.337 (2022, inc.)0.422 (2023, income (gross))
Japan0.338 (2021)0.323 (2020, inc.)0.307 (2021, income (net))
Italy0.325 (2023)0.343 (2023, inc.)0.409 (2023, income (gross))
Canada0.306 (2023)0.315 (2022, inc.)0.432 (2021, earnings)
Sweden0.289 (2024)0.293 (2023, inc.)0.411 (2023, income (gross))
Denmark0.276 (2022)0.299 (2023, inc.)0.417 (2023, income (gross))
Norway0.259 (2023)0.265 (2023, inc.)0.343 (2023, income (net))
Korea0.323 (2023)0.329 (2021, inc.)0.426 (2021, income (gross))
Mexico0.400 (2022)0.426 (2024, inc.)0.426 (2022, income (net/gross))
Chile0.448 (2022)0.430 (2024, inc.)0.447 (2022, income (net/gross))
Brazil0.451 (2022)0.503 (2024, inc.)0.515 (2023, income (net/gross))
South Africa0.618 (2017)0.541 (2022, cons.)0.619 (2017, income (net))
India0.495 (2011)0.255 (2022, cons.)0.359 (2012, consumption)
China (People’s Republic of)0.514 (2011)0.360 (2022, cons.)0.465 (2023, income (net))
Indonesianot covered0.344 (2025, cons.)0.391 (2017, consumption)
Viet Namnot covered0.361 (2022, cons.)0.372 (2018, income (gross))
Bangladeshnot covered0.309 (2022, cons.)0.499 (2022, income (net/gross))

Source: OECD IDD disposable-income Gini, current definition (METH2012), 0-1 scale. World Bank PIP survey Gini, national, latest survey. UNU-WIDER WIID latest High-quality observation, shown with its welfare concept (native 0-100 scale shown here on 0-1). The WIID row is not filtered to a single welfare concept, equivalence scale or area coverage, and some selected rows are urban-only, so the column is a provenance check on the same economy rather than a like-for-like match to the OECD and PIP columns. WIID quality flags across the full base: 20,238 High of 26,161 observations, 200 economies.

Inequality

Mexico saw the largest fall in disposable-income inequality

Disposable-income Gini coefficients for the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Sweden and Mexico, from each economy’s earliest current-definition observation through its latest.
United StatesUnited KingdomFranceGermanySwedenMexico

Source: OECD IDD, disposable-income Gini, current definition (METH2012), total population, shown on the 0-100 Gini scale.

Inequality

World extreme poverty fell at the 2021-PPP line despite a pandemic reversal

The World Bank rebased its international poverty lines to 2021 purchasing power parities in June 2025: the extreme-poverty line rose from $2.15 to $3.00 a day, with $4.20 and $8.30 companions. At the $3.00 line, the world extreme-poverty rate fell from 43.4% in 1990 to 10.4% in 2024, the latest year with survey-based estimates, or 847 million people. The fall was not monotonic: the rate rose from 10.8% in 2019 to 11.4% in 2020 as the pandemic hit, and PIP flags those two readings projection and actual respectively. Estimates after 2024 are nowcasts; PIP nowcasts 826 million below the line in 2026.
$3.00 a day (extreme)$8.30 a day
Line (a day, 2021 PPP)World ratePeople belowYear
$3.00 (extreme)10.4%847 million2024 (actual)
$4.2018.9%1541 million2024 (actual)
$8.3046.1%3751 million2024 (actual)

Source: World Bank Poverty and Inequality Platform PIP release 20260324, 2021 PPP. Lines from the World Bank's June 2025 poverty-line update. Latest actual year 2024; later years are nowcasts.

Method, units and the estimate contests are documented in the methodology. Related: the household balance sheets and net-worth distribution on wealth, asset-return histories on returns, what taxes and transfers do to these Ginis on redistribution, the same indicators ranked on rankings, and each economy's own page in the country directory.