Skip to content
FinObservatory

Funds / Flows and redemption pressure

What investors took out of funds, and what hedge funds borrowed

Registered investment companies other than money market funds and small business investment companies file Form N-PORT, and the public filing reports share sales, reinvested distributions and redemptions for each of the three months of the fund's fiscal quarter. This page maps those months onto true calendar months and aggregates them. Filings that carry no usable SEC series identifier are left out, because the panel is keyed on that identifier. What remains is 921,913 fund-months drawn from 317,753 filings by 17,474 funds, over 78 complete months from September 2019 to February 2026. OFR's Form PF aggregates add the borrowing and balance-sheet size of qualifying hedge funds by calendar quarter.

2.01%
Redeemed
of net assets, February 2026
$183.3B
Net flow
12,890 funds, February 2026
7.25%
March 2020
heaviest of 78 complete months
$41.10T
Net assets covered
at February 2026

Data as of February 2026 (SEC Form N-PORT data sets)

Fund level, not positions. The same N-PORT archives carry every security each fund holds. This module never opens those tables. The N-PORT collection on this page comes from the fund’s own summary items: Item B.1 (assets and liabilities), Item B.2.c (borrowings), Item B.3.c (credit spread risk) and Item B.6 (flow information). No individual fund is named here, and nothing is compared against a fund’s prospectus, its rating or any index provider’s classification of it.

Fund redemptions

March 2020 redemptions ran 3.2 times the median month

Monthly US subscriptions and redemptions as a percentage of reporting funds' net assets, 2019 to 2026 across the full window. Across the complete months other than the one below, redemptions run at a median of 2.30% of net assets a month, and the calmest month in the sample is 1.81%. The aggregate takes in more than it pays out in 67 of the 78 complete months, for $8.50T of cumulative net creation. One month sits apart from all of them. In that month funds redeemed 7.25% of net assets, the highest reading here, and net flow was −$355.3B: the largest outflow in the sample, 1.8 times the second largest (July 2025, −$192.7B).

78 complete months from Sep 2019 to Feb 2026. 1 NBER recession shaded.

Sales plus reinvested distributions B.6.a+bRedemptions B.6.c
20200.02.04.06.08.02019202120222023202420252026

Arrow keys: observations · Home/End: first/last · Esc: dismiss

Hover for values

Source: SEC, Form N-PORT Data Sets | NBER recession chronology via FRED USREC Each month's rate divides the summed flow by the summed net assets of the funds covering that month, so it is value-weighted. Both series are as filed, normalised only for the sign convention described in the methodology. Methodology

The heaviest months

MonthFundsNet assetsRedeemedNet flowFunds in outflow
March 202011,611$21.41T7.25%−$355.3B63.1%
April 202011,533$23.18T3.89%$47.5B52.2%
February 202211,752$30.17T3.54%$330.2B51.2%
December 202211,920$27.10T3.07%$310.3B41.1%
June 202211,805$27.07T2.99%$13.2B56.5%

Source: SEC, Form N-PORT Data Sets The five complete months with the highest value-weighted redemption rate, out of 78. "Funds in outflow" is the share of funds whose sales plus reinvested distributions fell short of their redemptions that month. Methodology

Fund redemptions

Credit-reporting funds drove 88.7% of March 2020 net outflow

Monthly US redemption rates in percent of reporting funds' net assets, grouped by reported credit spread risk. Form N-PORT Item B.3 asks for portfolio risk metrics only when the average value of the fund's debt positions over the previous three months exceeds a quarter of its net asset value, and Item B.3.c then splits credit spread sensitivity into investment grade and non-investment grade, with zeros required where there is no exposure. That separates the filings into three groups without any outside classification: funds reporting no credit spread sensitivity at all, funds reporting it for investment grade only, and funds reporting non-investment grade exposure. In that month the two credit-reporting groups held 31.8% of net assets across 3,175 of 11,611 funds.

Value-weighted redemption rate within each group, 78 complete months. 1 NBER recession shaded.

No credit risk reported B.3.c = 0Investment grade only B.3.c IGHigh yield reported B.3.c non-IG
20200.05.010.015.020.02019202120222023202420252026

Arrow keys: observations · Home/End: first/last · Esc: dismiss

Hover for values

Source: SEC, Form N-PORT Data Sets | SEC, Form N-PORT (OMB 3235-0730) Group membership is recomputed on every filing, so a fund that crosses the Item B.3 debt threshold moves between groups from that quarter on. The label describes what the fund reported, not what it is called. Methodology

Reported credit spread riskFundsNet assetsRedeemed, Mar 2020Median monthNet flow, Mar 2020
No credit spread risk reported8,436$14.60T4.90%2.04%−$40.1B
Investment grade only477$580.9B15.17%6.38%−$21.3B
Non-investment grade reported2,698$6.23T12.01%2.42%−$293.9B
All funds11,611$21.41T7.25%2.30%−$355.3B

Source: SEC, Form N-PORT Data Sets "Median month" is the median value-weighted redemption rate of that group over the 77 complete months other than March 2020, so the comparison never contains the episode it is compared against. Methodology

Redemption pressure

March 2020 moved the whole fund distribution, not only its tail

Monthly US equal-weighted quantiles of each fund's redemption rate in percent of its own net assets. An aggregate rate can hide a handful of large funds doing the redeeming. In the median month the median fund redeems 1.45% of its net assets, the 90th percentile fund 6.39% and the 95th 13.73%. During the episode those three read 4.03%, 18.55% and 33.42%, and 63.1% of funds paid out more than they took in against 51.2% in the median month.

Equal-weighted quantiles of the per-fund monthly redemption rate, 78 complete months. 1 NBER recession shaded.

Median fund p5075th percentile p7590th percentile p9095th percentile p95
20200.010.020.030.040.02019202120222023202420252026

Arrow keys: observations · Home/End: first/last · Esc: dismiss

Hover for values

Source: SEC, Form N-PORT Data Sets | NBER recession chronology via FRED USREC Equal-weighted, so each fund counts once whatever its size. A fund can redeem more than its period-end net assets in a month, so the upper quantiles are not bounded at 100%. Methodology

Fund leverage

Fund borrowings peaked at 0.586% of net assets

Quarterly US open-end fund liabilities and borrowings as a percentage of net assets. Across the 26 complete calendar quarters, total liabilities peak at 5.72% of net assets in 2020 Q1 and money actually borrowed from banks and other financial institutions also peaks in 2020 Q1, both in the quarter that contains the episode. Borrowing is also rare: between 231 and 318 funds a quarter report any, and 315 do in 2026 Q1 out of 12,886.

Value-weighted, 26 complete calendar quarters from 2019 Q4 to 2026 Q1. The borrowings line runs close to the axis because borrowing is the smaller part of what funds owe.

Total liabilities B.1.bBorrowings B.2.c
0.02.04.06.02019202120222023202420252026

Arrow keys: observations · Home/End: first/last · Esc: dismiss

Hover for values

Source: SEC, Form N-PORT Data Sets One balance sheet per filing, stamped with the calendar quarter its report date falls in. A fiscal quarter ends inside exactly one calendar quarter, so a fund normally contributes one balance sheet per calendar quarter; 267 of the 307,995 fund-quarters here carry two, from funds that moved their fiscal year-end, and both are counted. Methodology

Did the borrowers redeem harder?

The flow and the balance sheet come from the same filing, so the two can be crossed directly. Pooled over the complete months before March 2020 the funds that reported borrowings are almost indistinguishable from the rest, 2.44% against 2.39%. In March 2020 they redeemed 12.91% against 7.07%, and their net flow was −7.30% of net assets against −1.47%. The borrowing camp is 306 funds holding $685.2B.

Item B.2.c borrowingsFundsNet assetsRedeemed, Mar 2020Redeemed, beforeNet flow, Mar 2020
Reported306$685.2B12.91%2.44%−$50.0B
None reported11,305$20.72T7.07%2.39%−$305.3B

Source: SEC, Form N-PORT Data Sets "Before" pools every complete month earlier than March 2020, with each fund-month classified by the borrowings reported on the filing that carries it. Methodology

Qualifying hedge fund borrowing

Repo borrowing was larger by $22.0B in 2026 Q1

Quarter-end borrowing in trillions of U.S. dollars for qualifying hedge funds, from 2013 Q1 to 2026 Q1. OFR reports the three secured-borrowing categories from Form PF question 43.
Repurchase agreements RepoPrime brokerage Prime brokerageOther secured Other secured
$0.00T$1.00T$2.00T$3.00T$4.00T20132014201620182020202220242026

Arrow keys: observations · Home/End: first/last · Esc: dismiss

Hover for values
Qualifying Hedge Funds have at least $500 million in net assets and are advised by a Large Hedge Fund Adviser with at least $1.5 billion in hedge-fund assets. OFR aggregates, rounds, screens and masks Form PF data. Masked values remain null, and historical aggregates can be revised when amended filings arrive.

Source: OFR, Hedge Fund Monitor | OFR, SEC Form PF Data Sets Methodology

Qualifying hedge fund balance sheets

Gross assets were $12.63T against $4.92T of net assets in 2026 Q1

Quarter-end gross assets and net assets in trillions of U.S. dollars for qualifying hedge funds, from 2013 Q1 to 2026 Q1. Gross assets are the market value of balance-sheet assets, while net assets subtract liabilities.
Gross assets Gross assetsNet assets Net assets
$0.0T$5.0T$10.0T$15.0T20132014201620182020202220242026

Arrow keys: observations · Home/End: first/last · Esc: dismiss

Hover for values
Qualifying Hedge Funds have at least $500 million in net assets and are advised by a Large Hedge Fund Adviser with at least $1.5 billion in hedge-fund assets. OFR aggregates, rounds, screens and masks Form PF data. Masked values remain null, and historical aggregates can be revised when amended filings arrive.

Source: OFR, Hedge Fund Monitor | OFR, SEC Form PF Data Sets Methodology

2,152
Qualifying funds
at 2026 Q1
$12.63T
Gross assets
at 2026 Q1
$4.92T
Net assets
at 2026 Q1

Methodology

The three months are not January, February and March

The raw filing labels its flow fields MON1, MON2 and MON3. Those are the first, second and third months of the FUND'S FISCAL QUARTER, and funds keep different fiscal calendars. Form N-PORT requires a report for each month of a fiscal quarter, filed within 60 days of that quarter's end, and makes public the report for the third month; Item B.6 then asks for flows during each of the preceding three months. So MON3 is the calendar month of the report date, MON2 the month before it and MON1 the month before that. Reading MON1 as January would misdate March 2020 by two months for every fund whose fiscal quarter ends in May.

That mapping is checked rather than assumed. March 2020 reaches this panel through three groups of funds that share no members: those whose fiscal quarter ended that month, for whom it is the third month, and those whose quarters ended one and two months later, for whom it is the second and the first. If the offset were wrong for any of them, that group would be reporting an ordinary month while the others reported a run. They agree to 0.20 percentage points.

Position in the fiscal quarterFiscal quarter endsFundsNet assetsRedeemed, Mar 2020
First monthMay 20202,193$4.40T7.36%
Second monthApril 20203,270$5.78T7.35%
Third monthMarch 20206,148$11.23T7.16%

Source: SEC, Form N-PORT Data Sets | SEC, Form N-PORT (OMB 3235-0730) The three rows are disjoint sets of funds on disjoint fiscal calendars, so nothing in one row is arithmetically forced to match another. The build script refuses to write its output if they disagree by more than one percentage point. Methodology

The denominator

A rate needs net assets, and the filing reports them once, as of its own period end. For the third month of the fiscal quarter that is the true month end; for the first and second it is one or two months later, and nothing in the filing lets the earlier figures be reconstructed, because distributions paid in cash and expenses are not reported. Every rate here therefore divides a month's flow by the net assets of the filing it came from. 33.4% of the panel's rows carry a true month-end denominator. Recomputing March 2020 on those rows alone, which is a different and much smaller set of funds (6,148 funds), gives 7.16% against 7.25% for the whole month, so the choice of denominator is not what produces the episode.

The sign convention

Item B.6 asks for the total net asset value of shares sold, reinvested and redeemed, three magnitudes; the form reserves negative numbers for the gain and loss items. A minority of filers nonetheless report redemptions as a negative cash flow, and summing the two conventions together would net them against each other. The build takes the magnitude of all three components and keeps the original sign as a column so the normalisation can be audited. The two camps sit at different levels but move together. Pooled over the complete months before March 2020, the camp that files positive redeemed 2.13% of net assets and in March 2020 itself 6.13%, a multiple of 2.9; the camp that files negative went from 3.81% to 13.32%, a multiple of 3.5. The negative-filing camp is 19.4% of the panel's rows.

Coverage, and what is left out

Because each filing covers three months and a fund files once per fiscal quarter, a fund contributes at most one observation to any calendar month, and the build refuses to write the panel if one contributes two. The fund count per month is therefore a clean coverage signal, and the edges of the sample fail it. 5 months are dropped for that reason (Jul 2019, 5,606 funds; Aug 2019, 8,545 funds; Mar 2026, 10,337 funds; Apr 2026, 3,996 funds; May 2026, 3 funds), against 12,890 in February 2026. Counting fiscal-calendar cohorts alone would not have caught them all: 1 of the 5 dropped months carries all three cohorts and is trimmed on the fund count instead.

Two other exclusions are worth stating. Filings that carry no usable SEC series identifier are dropped, because the panel has no stable key for them. Fund-months missing any one of the three Item B.6 components are dropped as well, so that every row is complete and every aggregate covers the same rows. Where a fund changed its fiscal year-end and two filings overlap on a calendar month, the observation whose period end is nearer that month is kept. The build script prints the count for each of these, the net-asset share the series-identifier exclusion carries, and how many of the excluded filings report zero redemptions in all three months.

Definitions

Net flow is Item B.6.a plus Item B.6.b minus Item B.6.c: shares sold, plus shares issued for reinvested dividends and distributions, minus shares redeemed or repurchased. Reinvested distributions are counted as subscriptions because that is what they are, a distribution buying new shares, and they are reported separately so a reader can net them out. The redemption rate is Item B.6.c over Item B.1.c. Total liabilities are Item B.1.b and borrowings are Item B.2.c, amounts payable to banks and other financial institutions, within and after one year, both taken over Item B.1.c. All amounts are in US dollars, as Item B.1 requires. Nothing in the N-PORT collection is smoothed, screened by fund size, or adjusted for a fund entering or leaving the sample.

OFR Form PF aggregates

Qualifying Hedge Funds have at least $500 million in net assets and are advised by a Large Hedge Fund Adviser with at least $1.5 billion in hedge-fund assets. OFR groups the reporting funds by calendar quarter and publishes aggregate responses after rounding, screening and disclosure review. Gross assets come from Form PF question 8 and measure the market value of balance-sheet assets. Net assets come from question 9 and subtract liabilities from gross assets.

The borrowing series come from Form PF question 43 and keep OFR’s three secured-borrowing categories separate: repurchase agreements, prime brokerage and other secured borrowing. A blank value is masking, not zero, so it remains null and breaks the corresponding chart line. OFR’s historical calendar-quarter aggregates can change when amended filings arrive; this page uses the current published vintage and does not interpolate masked observations.

Sources

Credit facilities and the institutions providing them are on the fund credit facilities page. Money market funds are excluded from Form N-PORT and file Form N-MFP instead; they sit on the money funds page. The market-wide stress backdrop for March 2020 is on conditions.